Search for: All records

Stream dissolved oxygen (DO) dynamics are an outcome of metabolic activity and subsequently regulate ecosystem functions such as in-stream solute and sediment reactions. The synchronization of DO signals in and across stream networks is both a cause and effect of the mode and timing of these functions, but there is limited empirical evidence for network patterns of DO synchrony. We used high frequency DO measurements at 42 sites spanning five catchments and stream orders to evaluate DO signal synchrony in response to variation in light (a driver of photosynthesis) and discharge (a control on DO signal spatial extent). We hypothesized that stream network DO synchrony arises when regional controls dominate: when light inputs are synchronous and when longitudinal hydrologic connectivity is high. By complement, we predicted that DO signal synchrony decreases as light becomes more asynchronous and stream flows decline or become discontinuous. Our results supported this hypothesis: greater DO signal synchrony arose with increasing light synchrony and flow connectivity. A model including these two controls explained 70% of variation in DO synchrony. We conclude that DO synchrony patterns within- and across-networks support the current paradigm of discharge and light control on stream metabolic activity. Finally, we propose that DO synchrony patterns are likely a useful prerequisite for scaling subdaily metabolism estimates to network and regional scales. 

Riparian zones are a critical terrestrial‐aquatic ecotone. They play important roles in ecosystems including (1) harboring biodiversity, (2) influencing light and carbon fluxes to aquatic food webs, (3) maintaining water quality and streamflow, (4) enhancing aquatic habitat, (5) influencing greenhouse gas production, and (6) sequestering carbon. Defining what qualifies as a riparian zone is a first step to delineation. Many definitions of riparian boundaries focus on static attributes or a subset of potential functions without recognizing that they are spatially continuous, temporally dynamic, and multi‐dimensional. We emphasize that definitions should consider multiple ecological and biogeochemical functions and physical gradients, and explore how this approach influences spatial characterization of riparian zones. One or more of the following properties can guide riparian delineation: (1) distinct species, elevated biodiversity, or species with specific adaptations to flooding and inundation near streams relative to nearby upland areas; (2) unique vegetation structure directly influencing irradiance or organic material inputs to aquatic ecosystems; (3) hydrologic and geomorphic features or processes maintaining floodplains; (4) hydric soil properties that differ from the uplands; and/or (5) elevated retention of dissolved and suspended materials relative to adjacent uplands. Considering these properties for an operational and dynamic definition of riparian zones recognizes that riparian boundaries vary in space (e.g., variation of riparian corridor widths within or among watersheds) and time (e.g., responses to hydrological variance and climate change). Inclusive definitions addressing multiple riparian functions could facilitate attainment of research and management goals by linking properties of interest to specific outcomes.